At an April 16, 2009, forum at University
of Nevada, Las Vegas, titled "Minimizing the Impact of Conflict on U.S. Energy Security," Dr. Tyrus W. Cobb -
with an extensive background in energy and security - pointed out that 62 to 68 percent of the oil the U.S. requires must
be imported, plus China, India, South Korea, Japan and Vietnam are "looking at the same sources" of energy as the
United States.
"There will be serious conflict among these
countries" who are all seeking oil where it is available around the globe, Cobb emphasized.
At the conclusion of the forum, Cobb said the countries that will be inescapably competing for
the world's available petroleum must work with each other to control the fuses of possibly explosive conflicts.
Also at the UNLV forum, organized by UNLV's Institute for Security Studies, in partnership
with Nevada Alliance for Defense, Energy & Business and the Nevada World Affairs Council in Las Vegas, Dr. Ted Robert
Gurr - founder and co-author of the biennial report "Peace and Conflict: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination
Movements, and Democracy" - noted there are 26 significant armed conflicts in the world today.
He said all of Africa is unstable. He named many oil-producing countries that are both
"factional and fragile." Being reliant on these sources of oil keeps the U.S. in a very insecure position. He said
the U.S. must be committed to "a long-term effort to minimize oil dependence."
Another speaker at the UNLV forum on April 16, 2009, Dr. Dennis Pirages
- co-author of From Resource Scarcity to Ecological Security - delineated five key aspects of the "contemporary
energy predicament." Basically, he said, gas and oil are limited, competition for the resources is up with more
intensity to come, and the U.S. is increasingly getting its petroleum from "unreliable suppliers."
Many experts comment on the relationship
between oil-production and world conflict. In the May/June 2008 issue of Foreign Affairs, in an article titled "Blood
Barrels, Why Oil Wealth Fuels Conflict," by Michael L. Ross, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University
of California, Los Angeles, the author states that "oil-producing states make up a growing fraction of the world's
conflict-ridden countries. They now host about a third of the world's civil wars."
Oil breeds conflict within many countries, and "oil-producer-based conflict is likely to grow in
the future," Ross adds.
He states that countries, such as Canada
and Norway, which are well-governed with diverse economies and educated populations have avoided internal oil conflicts.
Ross states oil wealth in many countries "can cause economic instability, often helps
support insurgencies and encourages separatism" from central governments of some countries.
Another publication, the May 13, 2008, report by the National Security Network, states, "As long
as the U.S. needs massive amounts of fossil fuel imports - oil and gas - to keep our economy humming, we are at the mercy
of global markets and a small number of oil-exporting countries that have disproportionate power over us. Investing in energy
security is one of the smartest things we can do for our own national security, as well as our economic and environmental
future."
In the section titled Policy Recommendations, the
report notes, "We must reduce dependence on foreign oil and natural gas."
Logically, one of the policy recommendations is to invest in "green technology."